Skip to main content

Indigenous Land Back movement charts better way forward

 

By David Suzuki 

The Indigenous “Land Back” movement isn’t new, but it’s gaining increasing public attention and support. 

In this time of facing uncomfortable truths about past and ongoing harms inflicted on Indigenous Peoples and others, 

it’s important to understand the history of colonial oppression, and the roots and goals of Land Back and what it 

means.  

It’s not just about land. In the first of three short Land Back videos (about 12 minutes each) — “Past,” “Present” 

and “Future” — Ojibwe journalist Jesse Wente says, “It’s about self-determination for our Peoples here that should 

include some access to the territories and resources in a more equitable fashion, and for us to have control over how 

that actually looks.” 

Throughout Canada’s history, Indigenous Peoples have been forced from the lands that sustained them for millennia 

to ever-diminishing “reservations” so colonizers could exploit “resources.” Even national parks, including Jasper 

and Banff, and municipal parks like Vancouver’s Stanley Park, were created after the original people living there 

were expelled. 

As Jasper’s website says of the park’s creation in 1907, “Indigenous peoples were considered incompatible with 

nature and so couldn’t live in, hunt, or harvest within park boundaries. First Nation and Métis peoples were 

physically removed from the landscape, blocked from accessing it and banned from harvesting plants and animals, 

holding gatherings and accessing cultural sites.” 

Most federal and provincial Crown lands are viewed as storehouses of timber, oil, gas and minerals to be exploited 

and mostly exported. Indigenous Peoples have no say over what happens on most of it, so land defenders have to 

step in. 

Wente argues that Canada was established more as an “extractionist corporation” than a country. 

Anishinaabe storyteller and artist Bomgiizhik agrees: “When Canada formed and became its own country, they 

created something called the Indian Act, which was to force people off their traditional lands, have them contained 

onto reservations and then filtered into colonization so that they would never, ever become a threat to resource 

extraction.” 

As with the recent finding of 215 children buried on the grounds of the former Kamloops Residential School (and 

evidence of many more throughout the country), growing awareness of missing and murdered Indigenous women 

and girls, the appalling foster care and “’60s scoop” systems and more, these issues are not history; they’re 

ongoing, with impacts that continue through generations. 

Ultimately, Land Back is about confronting these colonial abuses and charting a new path. But it holds different 

meanings for different people.  

Anishinaabe-Ininew 4Rs Youth Movement co-ordinator Ronald Gamblin writes in a blog, “When I hear Indigenous 

youth and land protectors chant ‘Land Back!’ at a rally, I know it can mean the literal restoration of land ownership. 

When grandmothers and knowledge keepers say it, I tend to think it means more the stewardship and protection of 

mother earth. When Indigenous political leaders say it, it often means comprehensive land claims and self-governing 

agreements. No matter what meaning is attached, we as Indigenous nations have an urge to reconnect with our land 

in meaningful ways.”  

It’s about responsibilities as well as rights. Beverly Jacobs, acting dean at the University of Windsor’s law faculty 

and a member of the Haudenosaunee Confederation, says Indigenous laws are about responsibility, relationships and 

reciprocity. “It isn’t until we bring in the colonial law that all of a sudden we’re talking about rights,” she says, noting 

that rights are based on the individual whereas Indigenous law is based on responsibility to “all our relations,” including

 land. 

That’s important, as western ways are unsustainable. “It’s not that the Earth can’t sustain all of humanity. It’s that the 

Earth can’t sustain what humans are doing,” Wente says. 

The goal is to move forward together, not return to some idealized past. “Every relationship evolves, and our 

relationship with land has to be one that accepts our modern circumstances as Indigenous People,” Anishinaabe-Métis 

associate professor Aimée Craft says. 

Bomgiizhik says Canada must listen to Indigenous Peoples not just when they’re protesting or blockading. “How 

we’re going to win is by people working together and actually getting on the land and building sustainable economies 

with their bare hands.” 

Land Back is rooted in Indigenous Peoples’ rights and responsibilities, but it’s also about finding a better way 

forward 

for everyone who lives here. 

David Suzuki is a scientist, broadcaster, author and co-founder of the David Suzuki Foundation. Written with 

contributions from David Suzuki Foundation Senior Writer and Editor Ian Hanington.            

Learn more at davidsuzuki.org.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Environment, Energy and Economies - A Canadian Primer: ENVIRONMENT ENERGY AND ECONOMIES IN CANADA - Ray Hamm

A few companies account for more than half of Canada’s crude oil production: Suncor, Canadian Natural Resources, Imperial Oil, and Cenovus. (Husky and Cenovus have recently combined. Hong Kong billionaire, Li Ka-shing will hold approx 27% of the new Cenovus.) The oil industry in Canada has taken a hit. Larger external factors are more significant than pipeline delays and environmental regulations. (For example:  international oil prices collapsed.) If Canada would reduce production of petroleum, one of the first options should be to shut down the oil sands in Alberta.  Why start with the oil sands?  why not share cutbacks across the country? The oil sands produce 12% of Canadian Green House gases. Even with newer technology the GHG production of the oil sands is increasing every year due to increasing petroleum production. It costs more energy to produce a barrel of oil from the oil sands than from other sources. Oil sands technology has gotten more efficient but it is s...

Altona CAN! ...Live Sustainably - Connie Heppner Mueller

Welcome to Altona Community Action Network’s new column - AltonaCAN! ACAN is a small group of concerned citizens who reach out to the community to educate and inspire environmentally sustainable practices.  What has that looked like? We have hosted annual Earth Day events on various themes and partnered with town council to bring year-round composting to Altona. It has meant coordinating the community garden and supporting Boomerang Bags Altona to reduce our reliance on single-use plastic bags. We have a newly formed Tree Team that hopes to have some more t rees in the ground around Altona this fall. We were also gearing up to lead some waste reduction efforts at this year’s Sunflower Festival, but sadly that will have to wait for next year. What started as a fireside chat between two friends 5 years ago, has grown to a team of 9 members: Gavin Faurschou, Joanne Wiebe, Marilyn Houser Hamm, Joel Martin, Jack Heppner, Jonah Langelotz, Amy Pankewich, Kelly Skelton and Connie Heppner M...

Environment, Energy and Economies - A Canadian Primer: CANADIAN AGREEMENTS AND TARGETS Ray Hamm

A new Canadian Climate Accountability Act was introduced in November 2020, Healthy Environment and Healthy Economy, in December 2020. The Pan Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate was brought out in July 2020 - developed with the provinces and territories and in consultation with Indigenous peoples - to meet our emissions reduction targets, grow the economy, and build resilience to a changing climate. These look like good plans and projections. We can only hope that it will all work. One needs to look fairly deep to see specific numbers, there are a few. For the next 5 years, most of Canada is to be decreasing emissions or holding steady; Alberta is still projected to be increasing GHG emissions. It is hard to find specific numbers and goals among all the good words in these new plans. Time will tell, actual numbers over time, will show the real story.  Canada has a mixed record. At a 1992 UN conference, Canada was seen as a leader. This did not last long. In 2009, Canada ...