Skip to main content

From Sustainability to Transformation By Jack Heppner

 When I first began writing articles about ecology nearly two decades ago, I used the term “sustainability” quite 

frequently. But I am beginning to think that the term “transformation” would be a better one to focus on. 

In a recent lecture presented at Providence University College, Mark A. Burch, author of “Stepping Lightly: 

Simplicity for People and the Planet,” suggested that the concept of “sustainability” has been high-jacked in recent 

years by those who suggest that we can maintain our current levels of consumption, only find sustainable ways to do 

so. Such thinking, says Burch, must be replaced with the concept of “transformation,” which he suggests will call for 

significant adjustments to status quo lifestyle expectations.

Things are moving more quickly than anticipated. From 1970 to 2010 half of all living species on the planet have 

been depleted. Temperatures are rising more quickly than anticipated as ice packs are disappearing. Large population  

centers around the world are running out of fresh water. A third of the world’s topsoil, on which all life depends, has 

already vanished. Chemical pollution is mounting as are modern plagues. Some serious scientists, like Guy McPherson, 

are now predicting that by the middle of the 21st century life as we know it now will become virtually impossible. 

That means that my grandchildren are in for trouble. 

Other scientists are giving us a little more time, but most of them are saying that business as usual is not a viable 

option. Unlimited growth, even if fueled by renewable resources, will have to vanish from our thinking. A simple 

thought experiment will help us understand. Think of a small island, say about ten square miles, on which you are 

living. As more and more people arrive to live there everyone gets as creative as possible to make a viable livelihood 

for everyone. Eventually, however, it will become clear that the island has its limits. Well, so does our planet. 

That is why the call today is not simply to find a green alternative to support an affluent, consumerist lifestyle that

 assumes unlimited growth is possible. We will have to “transform” our expectations, perhaps as significantly as a 

caterpillar is transformed into a butterfly in the cocoon it spins for itself. Old ways of thinking, expectations and 

practice must be forgotten as we transition into a transformed lifestyle. 

Gone will be the assumptions that greed is good, that we are defined primarily as consumers, that unlimited growth 

is possible and that massive, global inequities are acceptable. In this transformed world impulsive narcissism will be 

replaced with simplicity rooted in mindfulness. The dream of affluence will be replaced with a notion of sufficiency 

where nothing is wasted. Clutter will give way to necessities, apathy to thoughtful action and individualism to 

community resilience. Fixing blame will be transformed into fixing problems and despair to a dream of enough for 

everyone for generations to come. 

ACAN seeks to educate and inspire sustainable practices in our community.

Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, altonacan.blogspot.com or email inquiries to  

altonacan@gmail.com Give us a shout if you would like to be a Friend of ACAN.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Altona CAN! ...Live Sustainably - Connie Heppner Mueller

Welcome to Altona Community Action Network’s new column - AltonaCAN! ACAN is a small group of concerned citizens who reach out to the community to educate and inspire environmentally sustainable practices.  What has that looked like? We have hosted annual Earth Day events on various themes and partnered with town council to bring year-round composting to Altona. It has meant coordinating the community garden and supporting Boomerang Bags Altona to reduce our reliance on single-use plastic bags. We have a newly formed Tree Team that hopes to have some more t rees in the ground around Altona this fall. We were also gearing up to lead some waste reduction efforts at this year’s Sunflower Festival, but sadly that will have to wait for next year. What started as a fireside chat between two friends 5 years ago, has grown to a team of 9 members: Gavin Faurschou, Joanne Wiebe, Marilyn Houser Hamm, Joel Martin, Jack Heppner, Jonah Langelotz, Amy Pankewich, Kelly Skelton and Connie Heppner M...

Environment, Energy and Economies - A Canadian Primer: GREEN HOUSE GASES (GHG) AND OIL COMPANIES Ray Hamm

The production and use of fossil fuels produces greenhouse gases. GHG are a small number of chemicals which reduce the amount of heat the earth reflects back into space. When too much GHG  gets into the atmosphere, it begins to make a difference. GHG make the earth warmer, like a greenhouse. Carbon, carbon dioxide, is the main factor in all this. China produces 26% of global GHG. The US is at 15%  Canada produces 2% of the total. Per capita, GHG emissions are quite different. China is #12. Canada and the US are in the top five in per capita GHG emissions. Coal continues to be “dirtier” than oil and natural gas. Tar sands oil is “dirtier” than regular oil - environmentally and economically more expensive. New technologies are improving some of the environmental impact. Fossil fuel companies are among the top carbon dioxide emitters in the world. Twenty corporations are responsible for more than a third of total global emissions  since 1965. (These lists are based on produc...

Altona CAN! Apply the Golden Rule During a Pandemic

  The other day, someone who falls into the high-risk category for COVID 19 was picking up some items at the  Farmer’s Market.   Because of her own risk factors, but also because she has family members who are high-risk, she  wore a mask as is currently advised by public health.  She was confronted by someone who argued that COVID-19  was “blown out of proportion” and that “a true person of faith wouldn’t live in fear and wear a mask.”    I am disturbed by this behaviour on two accounts.  First, the person who confronted the mask wearing individual  is someone who works with vulnerable people,  and comments about her beliefs about COVID-19 being blown out  of proportion suggest to me that she likely wouldn’t be someone who would take the necessary precautions (at least  not outside of her working environment).  Case in point: her comments were not stated from a respectful distance  of 2 meters.  Rather,...