Skip to main content

The Triple Bottom Line By Jack Heppner

Traditional economic theory dictates that ultimately any business or corporation will be successful only if it can make a financial profit; that is, keep the bottom financial line in the black. On the face of it, this makes a lot of sense. After all, if you keep on losing money it will be impossible to continue operating indefinitely. 

However, increasingly the concept of maintaining a “triple bottom line” in your business venture is gaining traction around the world. This term was first coined by John Elkington in 1994. “His argument was that companies should be preparing three different (and quite separate) bottom lines. One is the traditional measure of corporate profit – the bottom line of the profit and loss account. The second is the bottom line of a company’s ‘people account’ – a measure in some shape or form of how socially responsible an organization has been throughout its operation. The third is the bottom line of the company’s ‘planet’ account – a measure of how environmentally responsible it has been.”

By the turn of the century this focus on the three P’s – Profit, People and Planet – was beginning to catch on, especially as the hidden social and environmental costs of transferring production and services to low-cost countries began coming to light. 

In 2010, this movement got a significant boost with the publication of the book, People, Planet, Profit: How to Embrace Sustainability for Innovation and Business Growth, by Peter Fisk. In his book, Fisk made the case that successful businesses of the future will need to embrace this triple bottom line if they are to remain sustainable. Of course, these three bottom lines must be measured differently from each other, but Fisk says that we need to develop ways of doing so because an increasingly informed and concerned global population is demanding it be done. Businesses insisting on staying with the single bottom line paradigm will find themselves increasingly moved to the edges.

In State of the World 2014, Colleen Cordes documents the growing number of corporations around the world that are adopting the paradigm of the triple bottom line. She notes that, “A remarkable new breed of business is volunteering to be held publicly accountable to a triple bottom line: prioritizing people and the planet, while also promoting profits.”

A striking example of what can be done is that undertaken by Waste Management Phoenix Open at the world’s highest-attended golf tournament. “For the second consecutive year, the Waste Management Phoenix Open has diverted 100 percent of waste away from landfills amid this year’s record attendance of 563,008 fans… In total, the combined recycling, composting and waste-to-energy efforts avoided 346 metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions and recycling efforts conserved: 632 mature trees, 368,690 gallons of water, 471,248 kilowatt-hours of electricity, and 969 cubic yards of landfill space.”

Of course such a venture requires a lot of planning and moral and political will. But it demonstrates that there is a positive way forward by focusing on the triple bottom line. 

ACAN seeks to educate and inspire sustainable practices in our community.

Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, altonacan.blogspot.com or email inquiries to altonacan@gmail.com Give us a shout if you would like to be a Friend of ACAN.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Altona CAN! Apply the Golden Rule During a Pandemic

  The other day, someone who falls into the high-risk category for COVID 19 was picking up some items at the  Farmer’s Market.   Because of her own risk factors, but also because she has family members who are high-risk, she  wore a mask as is currently advised by public health.  She was confronted by someone who argued that COVID-19  was “blown out of proportion” and that “a true person of faith wouldn’t live in fear and wear a mask.”    I am disturbed by this behaviour on two accounts.  First, the person who confronted the mask wearing individual  is someone who works with vulnerable people,  and comments about her beliefs about COVID-19 being blown out  of proportion suggest to me that she likely wouldn’t be someone who would take the necessary precautions (at least  not outside of her working environment).  Case in point: her comments were not stated from a respectful distance  of 2 meters.  Rather,...

Environment, Energy and Economies - A Canadian Primer: GREEN HOUSE GASES (GHG) AND OIL COMPANIES Ray Hamm

The production and use of fossil fuels produces greenhouse gases. GHG are a small number of chemicals which reduce the amount of heat the earth reflects back into space. When too much GHG  gets into the atmosphere, it begins to make a difference. GHG make the earth warmer, like a greenhouse. Carbon, carbon dioxide, is the main factor in all this. China produces 26% of global GHG. The US is at 15%  Canada produces 2% of the total. Per capita, GHG emissions are quite different. China is #12. Canada and the US are in the top five in per capita GHG emissions. Coal continues to be “dirtier” than oil and natural gas. Tar sands oil is “dirtier” than regular oil - environmentally and economically more expensive. New technologies are improving some of the environmental impact. Fossil fuel companies are among the top carbon dioxide emitters in the world. Twenty corporations are responsible for more than a third of total global emissions  since 1965. (These lists are based on produc...

Environment, Energy and Economies - A Canadian Primer: OCEANS - Ray Hamm

  A large portion of the heat of the earth is stored in the oceans. Oceans cover 70% of our world. Imagine warming such a huge bathtub of water. The new, extra heat is reducing the ice in our world - land ice in Greenland and Antarctica, glaciers, sea ice in the polar regions. The rate of loss of ice in Antarctica has tripled in the last 10 years. Sea levels rose eight inches in the last century. The rate of sea level rise is now double what it was in the last century.  The oceans are the foundation of our climate patterns. Near or far, our lives depend on healthy oceans. Oceans produce half of the oxygen in our world. The oceans are like a flywheel that keeps the motor running. Oceans are the primary source of food for millions in the world. The carbon dioxide content of the oceans is changing, the temperature of the oceans is changing. Marine life in the oceans is being affected. Changes in the ocean also increase the frequency and the intensity of more extreme weather syste...