Skip to main content

The Triple Bottom Line By Jack Heppner

Traditional economic theory dictates that ultimately any business or corporation will be successful only if it can make a financial profit; that is, keep the bottom financial line in the black. On the face of it, this makes a lot of sense. After all, if you keep on losing money it will be impossible to continue operating indefinitely. 

However, increasingly the concept of maintaining a “triple bottom line” in your business venture is gaining traction around the world. This term was first coined by John Elkington in 1994. “His argument was that companies should be preparing three different (and quite separate) bottom lines. One is the traditional measure of corporate profit – the bottom line of the profit and loss account. The second is the bottom line of a company’s ‘people account’ – a measure in some shape or form of how socially responsible an organization has been throughout its operation. The third is the bottom line of the company’s ‘planet’ account – a measure of how environmentally responsible it has been.”

By the turn of the century this focus on the three P’s – Profit, People and Planet – was beginning to catch on, especially as the hidden social and environmental costs of transferring production and services to low-cost countries began coming to light. 

In 2010, this movement got a significant boost with the publication of the book, People, Planet, Profit: How to Embrace Sustainability for Innovation and Business Growth, by Peter Fisk. In his book, Fisk made the case that successful businesses of the future will need to embrace this triple bottom line if they are to remain sustainable. Of course, these three bottom lines must be measured differently from each other, but Fisk says that we need to develop ways of doing so because an increasingly informed and concerned global population is demanding it be done. Businesses insisting on staying with the single bottom line paradigm will find themselves increasingly moved to the edges.

In State of the World 2014, Colleen Cordes documents the growing number of corporations around the world that are adopting the paradigm of the triple bottom line. She notes that, “A remarkable new breed of business is volunteering to be held publicly accountable to a triple bottom line: prioritizing people and the planet, while also promoting profits.”

A striking example of what can be done is that undertaken by Waste Management Phoenix Open at the world’s highest-attended golf tournament. “For the second consecutive year, the Waste Management Phoenix Open has diverted 100 percent of waste away from landfills amid this year’s record attendance of 563,008 fans… In total, the combined recycling, composting and waste-to-energy efforts avoided 346 metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions and recycling efforts conserved: 632 mature trees, 368,690 gallons of water, 471,248 kilowatt-hours of electricity, and 969 cubic yards of landfill space.”

Of course such a venture requires a lot of planning and moral and political will. But it demonstrates that there is a positive way forward by focusing on the triple bottom line. 

ACAN seeks to educate and inspire sustainable practices in our community.

Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, altonacan.blogspot.com or email inquiries to altonacan@gmail.com Give us a shout if you would like to be a Friend of ACAN.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Environment, Energy and Economies - A Canadian Primer: ENVIRONMENT ENERGY AND ECONOMIES IN CANADA - Ray Hamm

A few companies account for more than half of Canada’s crude oil production: Suncor, Canadian Natural Resources, Imperial Oil, and Cenovus. (Husky and Cenovus have recently combined. Hong Kong billionaire, Li Ka-shing will hold approx 27% of the new Cenovus.) The oil industry in Canada has taken a hit. Larger external factors are more significant than pipeline delays and environmental regulations. (For example:  international oil prices collapsed.) If Canada would reduce production of petroleum, one of the first options should be to shut down the oil sands in Alberta.  Why start with the oil sands?  why not share cutbacks across the country? The oil sands produce 12% of Canadian Green House gases. Even with newer technology the GHG production of the oil sands is increasing every year due to increasing petroleum production. It costs more energy to produce a barrel of oil from the oil sands than from other sources. Oil sands technology has gotten more efficient but it is s...

Altona CAN! ...Live Sustainably - Connie Heppner Mueller

Welcome to Altona Community Action Network’s new column - AltonaCAN! ACAN is a small group of concerned citizens who reach out to the community to educate and inspire environmentally sustainable practices.  What has that looked like? We have hosted annual Earth Day events on various themes and partnered with town council to bring year-round composting to Altona. It has meant coordinating the community garden and supporting Boomerang Bags Altona to reduce our reliance on single-use plastic bags. We have a newly formed Tree Team that hopes to have some more t rees in the ground around Altona this fall. We were also gearing up to lead some waste reduction efforts at this year’s Sunflower Festival, but sadly that will have to wait for next year. What started as a fireside chat between two friends 5 years ago, has grown to a team of 9 members: Gavin Faurschou, Joanne Wiebe, Marilyn Houser Hamm, Joel Martin, Jack Heppner, Jonah Langelotz, Amy Pankewich, Kelly Skelton and Connie Heppner M...

Environment, Energy and Economies - A Canadian Primer: CANADIAN AGREEMENTS AND TARGETS Ray Hamm

A new Canadian Climate Accountability Act was introduced in November 2020, Healthy Environment and Healthy Economy, in December 2020. The Pan Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate was brought out in July 2020 - developed with the provinces and territories and in consultation with Indigenous peoples - to meet our emissions reduction targets, grow the economy, and build resilience to a changing climate. These look like good plans and projections. We can only hope that it will all work. One needs to look fairly deep to see specific numbers, there are a few. For the next 5 years, most of Canada is to be decreasing emissions or holding steady; Alberta is still projected to be increasing GHG emissions. It is hard to find specific numbers and goals among all the good words in these new plans. Time will tell, actual numbers over time, will show the real story.  Canada has a mixed record. At a 1992 UN conference, Canada was seen as a leader. This did not last long. In 2009, Canada ...